Quality analysis of prior systematic reviews of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of the literature

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common condition greatly affects patients' quality of life and ability to work. Systematic reviews provide useful information for treatment and health decisions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the methodological quality of previously published systematic reviews on the treatment of CTS. DESIGN AND SETTING: Overview of systematic reviews conducted at the Brazilian public higher education institution, São Paulo, Brazil METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library database for systematic reviews investigating the treatment of CTS in adults. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR) were applied by two independent examiners. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies were included. Considering the stratification within the AMSTAR measurement tool, we found that more than 76% of the analyzed studies were "low" or "very low". PRISMA scores were higher when meta-analysis was present (15.61 versus 10.40; P = 0.008), while AMSTAR scores were higher when studies performed meta-analysis (8.43 versus 5.59; P = 0.009) or when they included randomized controlled trials (7.95 versus 6.06; P = 0.043). The intra-observer correlation demonstrated perfect agreement (> 0.8), a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.829, and an ICC of0.857. The inter-observer correlation indicated that AMSTAR was more reliable than PRISMA. CONCLUSION: Overall, systematic reviews of the treatment of CTS are of poor quality. Reviews with better-quality conducted meta-analysis and included randomized controlled trials. AMSTAR is a better tool than PRISMA because it has a better performance and should be recommended in future studies. REGISTRATION NUMBER IN PROSPERO: CRD42020172328 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020172328)

Diagnostic criteria and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials on carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) lack uniformity. Moreover, because CTS is a syndrome, there is no consensus as to which signs, symptoms, clinical and complementary tests are more reproducible and accurate for use in clinical research. This heterogeneity is reflected in clinical practice. Thus, establishing effective and comparable care protocols is difficult. OBJECTIVE: To identify the diagnostic criteria and outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on CTS. DESING AND SETTING: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials carried out at the Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for RCTs with surgical intervention for CTS published between 2006 and 2019. Two investigators independently extracted relevant data on diagnosis and outcomes used in these studies. RESULTS: We identified 582 studies and 35 were systematically reviewed. The symptoms, paresthesia in the median nerve territory, nocturnal paresthesia, and special tests were the most widely used clinical diagnostic criteria. The most frequently assessed outcomes were symptoms of paresthesia in the median nerve territory and nocturnal paresthesia. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic criteria and outcome measures used in RCTs about CTS are heterogeneous, rendering comparison of studies difficult. Most studies use unstructured clinical criteria associated with ENMG for diagnosis. The Boston Questionnaire is the most frequently used main instrument to measure outcomes. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020150965- https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=150965).

Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints / Questionários Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand e Michigan Hand: Explorando a responsividade e performance diagnóstica em amostra de pacientes ambulatoriais com e sem queixas nas mãos e punho

Abstract Objective The present study aimed to verify whether, in an adult population with nontraumatic complaints in the upper limbs, (1) the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) are susceptible to a "ceiling effect" when compared with a sample of healthy subjects; and (2) to determine cutoff points for diagnostic performance and the intercorrelation for DASH and MHQ in both samples. Methods This was a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study. In total, 150 subjects were included, with 75 in the case group (with disease) and 75 in the control group (without disease). This was a sample of patients recently admitted to a hand surgery outpatient clinic. Controls were matched to clinical cases according to inclusion. The ceiling effect was determined by a maximum response rate (> 15%); receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined cutoff points for sickness definition, and DASH and MHQ sensitivity and specificity. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results The DASH and MHQ questionnaires had no ceiling effect for the case group. In this group, 18 (24%) patients had the maximum DASH score, but none (0%) had the maximum MHQ score. For the control group, 1 (1.33%) subject had the maximum DASH score, but none scored for MHQ. For case determination, DASH scores of 7.1 had 80% sensitivity and 60.3% specificity, whereas MHQ scores of 76.9 had 56.2% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity. Conclusion The DASH and MHQ questionnaires are reliable tools to measure the impact of hand and wrist morbidities on daily activities, and they are not susceptible to ceiling effects. The DASH questionnaire is more sensitive for patient identification, whereas the MHQ is more specific. As such, the MHQ seems more appropriate when a more specific functional increase is expected.

Resumo Objetivo Verificar se, em uma população adulta com queixa não traumática dos membros superiores, (1) os questionários Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH, na sigla em inglês) e Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ, na sigla em inglês) estão suscetíveis ao "efeito de teto", comparando com amostra de não-doentes; (2) determinar pontos de corte de performance diagnóstica e correlação interquestionários para DASH e MHQ em ambas as amostras. Método Estudo prospectivo, comparativo e não randomizado. Incluímos 150 pacientes, 75 no grupo caso (com doença) e 75 no grupo controle (sem doença). Trata-se de amostra de pacientes recém-admitidos em ambulatório de cirurgia da mão. Os controles foram pareados de forma balanceada de acordo com a inclusão dos casos. Determinamos a presença de efeito de teto por meio da taxa de respostas máximas (> 15%) e associamos curvas receiver operating characteristic (ROC, na sigla em inglês) para a determinação de pontos de corte para a determinação de doentes, associados a medidas de sensibilidade e especificidade. Consideramos p < 0.05 para significância estatística. Resultados Os questionários DASH e MHQ não demonstraram o efeito de teto para o grupo com doença. A porcentagem de pacientes do grupo caso com nota máxima foi de n = 18 (24%) no DASH e de 0% no MHQ. Para o grupo sem doença, 1 (1,33%) dos participantes pontuou com nota máxima para DASH, enquanto nenhum pontuou para o MHQ. Na determinação de casos, escores de DASH de 7,1 apresentam sensibilidade de 80% e especificidade de 60,3%. Para o MHQ, um escore de 76,9 apresenta sensibilidade de 56,2% e especificidade de 97,3%. Conclusão Os questionários DASH e MHQ são ferramentas confiáveis na mensuração do impacto das morbidades das mãos e dos punhos nas atividades diárias dos pacientes e não são suscetíveis a efeito de teto. O questionário DASH é mais sensível para a identificação de doentes, enquanto o MHQ é mais específico. Em situações nas quais se espera um incremento funcional mais discreto (ou mais específico), o MHQ parece mais adequado.

Hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ABSTRACT Objective We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS (January 2019 to March 2021) for patients aged 18 years or older, who had COVID-19 and were treated with hydroxychloroquine versus placebo or standard of care. We also searched the WHO Clinical Trials Registry for ongoing and recently completed studies, and the reference lists of selected articles and reviews for possible relevant studies, with no restrictions regarding language or publication status. Random-effects models were used to obtain pooled mean differences of treatment effect on mortality, and serious adverse effects between hydroxychloroquine and the Control Group (standard of care or placebo); heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and the Cochran´s Q statistic. Results Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between patients treated with hydroxychloroquine compared to standard of care or placebo (16.7% versus 18.5%; pooled risk ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.19). Also, the rate of serious adverse effects was similar between both Groups, Hydroxychloroquine and Control (3.7% versus 2.9%; pooled risk ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.96). Conclusion Hydroxychloroquine is not efficacious in reducing mortality of COVID-19 patients. Prospero database registration (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) under number CRD42020197070.

The effect of the use of alcohol and drugs on motorcyclical traumas with surgical treatment fractures: epidemiology / O efeito do uso de álcool e drogas em traumas motociclísticos com fraturas de tratamento cirúrgico: epidemiologia

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify the prevalence of patients who were victims of motorcycle trauma who were under the influence of alcohol and drugs. Methods: The study was observational and prospective, with patients hospitalized to the Orthopedics and Traumatology Ward of Hospital São Paulo (UNIFESP), from March 2015 to March 2016. The study included patients of all genders, over 18 years old, hospitalized due to motorcycle trauma and who needed orthopedic surgical treatment. Results: During the research, 282 patients were hospitalized, of which 23.8% were victims of motorcycle trauma. Of these, 49.3% motorcyclists reported the use of alcohol and drugs before the accident, while 50.7% denied their consumption. In the analysis of alcohol and drug consumption in patients with motorcycle injuries, the results showed that: 65% used only alcohol; 16% used both alcohol and drugs; and 19% used only illicit drugs. Conclusion: The incidence of patients who suffered motorcycle accidents under the influence of alcohol and drugs was 49.3%. Level of Evidence IV, Prospective Case Series.

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar a prevalência de pacientes vítimas de trauma motociclístico que estavam sob efeito de álcool e drogas. Métodos: Estudo observacional e prospectivo, com pacientes internados na Enfermaria de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital São Paulo (Unifesp), de março de 2015 a março de 2016. Foram incluídos pacientes de ambos os sexos, idade superior a 18 anos, internados por trauma motociclístico e que necessitavam de tratamento cirúrgico ortopédico. Resultados: Durante a pesquisa, foram internados 282 pacientes, dos quais 23,8% eram vítimas de trauma motociclístico. Desses, 49,3% motociclistas referiram o uso de álcool e drogas previamente ao sinistro, enquanto 50,7% negaram o consumo. Na análise do consumo de álcool e drogas nos pacientes de traumas motociclísticos, foi observado que 65% estavam sob efeito apenas de álcool, 16% estavam sob efeito de álcool e drogas, e 19% sob efeito de drogas ilícitas. Conclusão: A incidência de pacientes que sofreram acidentes motociclísticos sob efeito de álcool e drogas foi de 49,3%. Nível de Evidência IV, Série de Casos Prospectivos.

WALANT versus intravenous regional anesthesia for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: There are several anesthetic techniques for surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Results from this surgery using the "wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet" (WALANT) technique have been described. However, there is no conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of the WALANT technique, compared with the usual techniques. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the WALANT technique, compared with intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA; Bier's block), for surgical treatment of CTS. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized clinical trial, conducted at Hospital Alvorada Moema and the Discipline of Hand Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were included. The primary outcome was measurement of perioperative pain through a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the Boston Questionnaire score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, need for use of analgesics, operating room times, remission of paresthesia, failures and complications. RESULTS: The WALANT technique (n = 40) proved to be superior to IVRA (n = 38), especially for controlling intraoperative pain (0.11 versus 3.7 cm; P < 0.001) and postoperative pain (0.6 versus 3.9 cm; P < 0.001). Patients spent more time in the operating room in the IVRA group (59.5 versus 46 minutes; P < 0.01) and needed to use more analgesics (10.8 versus 5.7 dipyrone tablets; P = 0.02). Five IVRA procedures failed (5 versus 0; P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The WALANT technique is more effective than IVRA for CTS surgery.

Onset of Trigger Finger after Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery: Assessment of Open and Endoscopic Techniques / Frequência do aparecimento de dedo em gatilho no pós-operatório da síndrome do túnel do carpo em duas técnicas cirúrgicas: Aberta e endoscópica

Abstract Objective The present study aimed to determine the frequency of trigger finger (TF) onset after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using an open (OT) or an endoscopic technique (ET). As a secondary endpoint, the present study also compared paresthesia remission and residual pain rates in patients submitted to both techniques. Methods Trigger finger onset and remission rates of paresthesia and pain at the median nerve territory was verified prospectively in a series of adult patients submitted to an OT procedure (n = 34). These findings were compared with a retrospective cohort submitted to ET (n = 33) by the same surgical team. Patients were evaluated with a structured questionnaire in a return visit at least 6 months after surgery. Results Sixty-seven patients were evaluated. There was no difference regarding trigger finger onset (OT, 26.5% versus ET, 27.3%; p = 0.94) and pain (OT, 76.5% versus ET, 84.8%; p = 0.38). Patients submitted to OT had fewer paresthesia complaints compared with those operated using ET (OT, 5.9% versus ET, 24.2%; p = 0.03). Conclusions In our series, the surgical technique did not influence trigger finger onset and residual pain rates. Patients submitted to OT had less complaints of residual postoperative paresthesia.

Resumo Objetivo Determinar a frequência do aparecimento de dedo em gatilho (DG) no pós-operatório da síndrome do túnel do carpo (STC) em duas técnicas: aberta (TA) e endoscópica (TE). Como desfecho secundário, comparar as taxas de remissão da parestesia e dor residual entre as duas técnicas. Métodos De forma prospectiva, verificamos o aparecimento de dedo em gatilho e taxa de remissão da parestesia e dor no território do nervo mediano em série de pacientes adultos operados pela TA (n = 34). Comparamos com coorte retrospectiva operada pela TE (n = 33), pela mesma equipe de cirurgiões. A avaliação dos pacientes ocorreu por meio de questionário estruturado em consulta de retorno, com mínimo de 6 meses de pós-operatório. Resultados Sessenta e sete pacientes foram avaliados. Não houve diferença quanto ao aparecimento de dedo em gatilho (TA, 26,5% versus TE, 27,3%; p = 0,94) e dor (TA, 76,5% versus TE, 84.8%; p = 0,38). Os pacientes operados pela TA apresentaram menos queixas de parestesia do que os operados pela TE (TA 5,9% versus TE 24,2%; p = 0,03). Conclusões Em nossa série, a técnica cirúrgica não influenciou o aparecimento de dedos em gatilho e dor residual. Os pacientes operados pela técnica aberta apresentaram menos queixa de parestesia residual pós-operatória.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Trigger Finger in Brazil - A Cross-Sectional Study / Diagnóstico e tratamento do dedo de gatilho no Brasil - Estudo transversal

Abstract Objective The present paper aims to evaluate the therapeutic planning for trigger finger by Brazilian orthopedists. Methods This is a cross-sectional study with a population composed of participants from the 2018 Brazilian Congress on Orthopedics and Traumatology (CBOT-2018, in the Portuguese acronym), who answered a questionnaire about the conduct adopted for trigger finger diagnosis and treatment. Results A total of 243 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 37.46 years old; most participants were male (88%), with at least 1 year of experience (55.6%) and from Southeast Brazil (68.3%). Questionnaire analysis revealed a consensus on the following issues: diagnosis based on physical examination alone (73.3%), use of the Quinnell classification modified by Green (58.4%), initial nonsurgical treatment (91.4%), infiltration of steroids combined with an anesthetic agent (61.7%), nonsurgical treatment time ranging from 1 to 3 months (52.3%), surgical treatment using the open approach (84.4%), mainly the transverse open approach (51%), triggering recurrence as the main nonsurgical complication (58%), and open surgery success in > 90% of the cases (63%), with healing intercurrences (54%) as the main complication. There was no consensus on the remaining variables. Orthopedists with different practicing times disagree on treatment duration (p = 0.013) and on the complication rate of open surgery (p = 0.010). Conclusions Brazilian orthopedists prefer to diagnose trigger finger with physical examination alone, to classify it according to the Quinnell method modified by Green, to institute an initial nonsurgical treatment, to perform infiltrations with steroids and local anesthetic agents, to sustain the nonsurgical treatment for 1 to 3 months, and to perform the surgical treatment using a transverse open approach; in addition, they state that the main nonsurgical complication was triggering recurrence, and report open surgery success in > 90% of the cases, with healing intercurrences as the main complication.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o planejamento terapêutico para o dedo em gatilho por ortopedistas brasileiros. Métodos Estudo transversal, cuja população foi composta por participantes do Congresso Brasileiro de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2018 (CBOT-2018). Foi aplicado um questionário sobre a conduta adotada no diagnóstico e tratamento do dedo em gatilho. Resultados Foram analisados 243 participantes com média de idade de 37.46 anos, na maioria homens (88%), tempo de experiência de pelo menos 1 ano (55,6%), e da região Sudeste (68.3%). A análise dos questionários evidenciou que há consenso nos seguintes quesitos: diagnóstico somente com exame físico (73,3%), classificação de Quinnell modificada por Green (58,4%), tratamento inicial não cirúrgico (91,4%), infiltração de corticoide com anestésico (61,7%) tempo de tratamento não cirúrgico de 1 a 3 meses (52,3%), tratamento cirúrgico pela via aberta (84,4%), principalmente via aberta transversa (51%), recidiva do engatilhamento como principal complicação não cirúrgica (58%), e o sucesso da cirurgia aberta em > 90% (63%), sendo a sua principal complicação as complicações cicatriciais (54%). Sem consenso nas demais variáveis. De acordo com a experiência, foram observadas diferenças referentes ao tempo de tratamento (p = 0.013) e a taxa de complicação da cirurgia aberta (p = 0.010). Conclusões O ortopedista brasileiro tem preferência pelo diagnóstico do dedo em gatilho apenas com exame físico, classifica segundo Quinnell modificado por Green, tratamento inicial não cirúrgico, infiltrações com corticoide e anestésico local, tempo de tratamento não cirúrgico de 1 a 3 meses, tratamento cirúrgico por via aberta transversa, principal complicação não cirúrgica a recidiva do engatilhamento, e considera o sucesso da cirurgia aberta em > 90% dos casos, tendo como principal complicação as complicações cicatriciais.

Percutaneous Fixation without Bone Graft for Scaphoid Nonunion / Fixação percutânea sem enxerto ósseo para pseudartrose do escafóide

Abstract Objective To describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients submitted to percutaneous fixation without bone graft for scaphoid nonunion, with a minimum follow-up of six months. Methods A case series study of a convenience sample of hand surgeons with prospective evaluation. Patients with scaphoid (waist or proximal pole) nonunion and the following features were included: more than six months of history; X-rays showing sclerosis of the edges of the nonunion, with resorption of the nonunion focus measuring less than 4 mm (Slade & Gleissler I, II, III and IV) and no angular deformity; and no proximal pole necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results After six months of follow-up, all nonunion were consolidated, with no major complications. The functional outcomes revealed good scores on the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH; n = 12; mean: 6.9; standard deviation [SD]: 2.1) and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE; n = 12; mean: 7.97, SD: 1.5) questionnaires. The results of the visual analog scale (VAS) showed little residual pain (n = 12; mean: 0.71; SD: 0.2). Slight decreases in flexion (69 versus 59.1; p = 0.007), extension (62.4 versus 48.7; p = 0.001) and radial deviation (29.6 versus 24.6; p = 0.014) were detected in comparison to the contralateral side. Conclusions All cases in the series presented consolidation and good functional scores at the six-month evaluation. This is a promising option (with lower technical demand and morbidity) for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Comparative studies are required to assess the effectiveness of this technique in comparison with other options.

Resumo Objetivo Descrever os resultados clínico-radiográficos de pacientes tratados por meio de fixação percutânea sem enxerto ósseo para pseudartrose do escafóide, com seguimento mínimo de seis meses. Métodos Série de casos de uma amostra de conveniência de grupo de cirurgiões de mão com avaliação prospectiva.. Foram incluídos pacientes com diagnóstico de pseudartrose do escafóide (cintura ou polo proximal) com as seguintes características: mais de seis meses de histórico; radiografias demonstrando esclerose das bordas da pseudartrose, com reabsorção do foco de pseudartrose menor do que 4 mm (Slade & Gleissler I, II, III e IV), sem deformidade angular; e sem necrose do polo proximal pela ressonância magnética (RM). Resultados Na avaliação com mais de seis meses, todas as pseudartroses estavam consolidadas e sem maiores complicações. Os resultados funcionais demonstraram boas pontuações nos questionários de disfunções do braço, ombro e mão (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, DASH; n = 12; média: 6,9; desvio padrão [DP]: 2,1) e de avaliação do punho pelo paciente (patient-rated wrist evaluation, PRWE; n = 12; média: 7,97; DP: 1,5). Observou-se pouca dor residual de acordo com a escala visual analógica (EVA; n = 12; média: 0,71; DP: 0,2). Houve discreta diminuição da flexão (69 versus 59,1; p = 0,007), da extensão (62,4 versus 48,7; p = 0,001) e do desvio radial (29,6 versus 24.6; p = 0,014) em comparação ao lado contralateral. Conclusões Nesta série, todos os casos estavam consolidados ao sexto mês de avaliação, com bom status funcional. Trata-se de uma opção promissora (menor demanda técnica e morbidade) para o tratamento da pseudartrose do escafóide. Estudos comparativos serão úteis para avaliar a efetividade da técnica com relação a outras opções.

Circular saw misuse is related to upper limb injuries: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: Machinery injuries account for a substantial share of traumatic upper limb injuries (TULIs) affecting young active individuals. This study is based on the hypothesis that there is an important relationship between the improper use of power saws and TULIs. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence and epidemiology of TULIs caused by power saws and determine the risks related to power saw use. METHODS: A cross-sectional evaluation of medical records from a two-year period was performed. Patients sustaining TULIs related to power saws were analyzed. Data on the epidemiology, site of injury, mechanism of trauma, technical specifications of the tool, cutting material, personal protective equipment, time lost and return to work were obtained. RESULTS: A database search retrieved 193 TULI records, of which 104 were related to power saws. The majority of patients were male (102/104; 98.1%), right-handed (97/104; 93.3%), and manual workers (46/104; 44.2%), with an average age of 46.8 years. The thumb was the most frequently injured site (32/93; 34.4%). Most of the injuries were caused by manual saws (85/104; 81.7%), and masonry saws accounted for 68.2% (58/85) of the cases. Masonry saws improperly used for woodwork resulted in 86.2% (50/58) of the injuries. TULI caused by masonry saws was 5 times higher in manual workers than in other patients. In addition, masonry saws had a risk of kickback 15 times higher than that of other saws, and the risk of injury increased by 5.25 times when the saws were used improperly for wood cutting. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of TULIs related to power saws was demonstrated and was mainly associated with manual saws operated by manual workers that inappropriately used masonry saws for woodworking.

Treatment of fingertip injuries by specialists in hand surgery in brazil / Tratamento de lesões da ponta dos dedos por especialistas em cirurgia da mão no brasil

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify if there is consensus about the treatment of each type of injury or amputation of the fingertips, and if there is a statistical difference among the treatment options according to the surgeon's length of time in the hand surgery specialty. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted during the 37th Brazilian Congress of Hand Surgery, when one hundred and twenty questionnaires were randomly distributed. Observing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, ninety completed questionnaires were included. The answers were submitted to descriptive and inferential analysis with a significance level of p <0.05. Results: This study showed agreement of 63.3% for the treatment with statistical difference for dorsal oblique injury less than 1 cm with bone exposure for the VY advancement flap alternative; 46.7% for volar tip oblique injury with bone exposure less than 1 cm for the Cross Finger alternative; 47.8% for oblique thumb volar injury greater than 1 cm with no bone exposure to the Moberg alternative; 54.4% for thumb pulp injury up to 2.5 cm with bone exposure to the Moberg alternative with proximal release, and 92.2% for antibiotic use, for the "cephalexin" alternative. Conclusion: There is no consensus regarding the treatment of most types of fingertip lesions, with agreement of 45.4%. When we subdivided by time group of specialty in hand surgery, there was an increase in agreement to 54.5% of the questions per subgroup. Further comparative studies are needed to assess the consensus among surgeons regarding the treatment of fingertip injury. Level of Evidence III; Cross-sectional survey.

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar se há consenso sobre o tratamento de cada tipo de lesão ou amputação da ponta do dedo e se há diferença estatística entre as opções de tratamento de acordo com o tempo em que o cirurgião atua na especialidade de cirurgia da mão. Métodos: Pesquisa transversal realizada durante o 37° Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia da Mão, quando foram distribuídos cento e vinte questionários de forma aleatória. Observando-se os critérios de inclusão e exclusão, noventa questionários respondidos foram incluídos. As respostas foram submetidas a análise descritiva e inferencial com índice de significância de p < 0,05. Resultados: Este estudo apresentou concordância no tratamento com diferença estatística para lesão oblíqua dorsal menor que 1 cm com exposição óssea para a alternativa de retalho de avanço VY com 63,3%; lesão oblíqua volar com exposição óssea menor que 1 cm para a alternativa Cross Finger com 46,7%; lesão oblíqua volar do polegar maior de 1 cm sem exposição óssea para a alternativa Moberg com 47,8%; lesão da polpa do polegar com até 2,5 cm com exposição óssea para a alternativa Moberg com liberação proximal com 54,4% e uso de antibióticos para a alternativa "cefalexina" com 92,2%. Conclusão: Não há consenso quanto ao tratamento da maioria dos tipos de lesão da ponta do dedo, sendo que houve concordância em 45,4%. Quando subdividimos por grupo de tempo de especialização em cirurgia de mão, verificou-se aumento da concordância para 54,5% das questões por subgrupo. Há necessidade de realização de novos estudos comparativos para avaliarmos o consenso entre os cirurgiões com relação ao tratamento da lesão das pontas dos dedos. Nível de evidência III; Pesquisa transversal.

How scaphoid fractures are treated in brazil / Como são tratadas as fraturas do escafoide no brasil

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications. Methods: Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36th Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016). Results: On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02). Conclusions: We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures. Level of Evidence IV, Cross-sectional survey.

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar como os cirurgiões da mão conduzem o tratamento da fratura de escafoide e suas complicações. Métodos: Durante o 36° Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia da Mão (2016) foram distribuídos 200 questionários. Resultados: Na suspeita da fratura sem confirmação radiográfica, 57% dos cirurgiões solicitam TC ou RM, enquanto 43% optam por imobilização e radiografia seriada. Nas fraturas estáveis, a preferência foi tratamento com gesso. Nas fraturas sem desvio da cintura do escafoide, 33% optam pela fixação percutânea. Nas fraturas desviadas do polo proximal ou da cintura, a opção é o tratamento cirúrgico em 66% e 99,4%. A maioria trata a pseudoartrose da cintura com enxerto não vascularizado. Quando a absorção no foco da pseudoartrose é maior que 4 mm, 50% preferem utilizar enxerto do ilíaco e fixar com parafuso. Nas pseudoartroses do polo proximal, a técnica de Zaidemberg é a preferida por 64%. Os cirurgiões mais experientes têm maior propensão para pedir exames em fraturas ocultas (63,9% versus 47,6%; p = 0,04) e tendem a indicar cirurgia com mais frequência para as fraturas do terço distal (16,4% versus 4,7%; p = 0,02). Conclusões: Forneceu-se panorama das preferências de tratamento para as fraturas do escafoide. Destaca-se maior tendência de cirurgiões mais experientes para solicitação de exames subsidiários para fraturas ocultas e maior indicação cirúrgica para as fraturas do terço distal. Nível de Evidência IV, Estudo transversal tipo survey.

Applicability of randomized trials in hand surgery: survey study / Aplicabilidade de ensaios randomizados em cirurgia da mão: estudo tipo survey

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the applicability of randomized clinical trials and whether certain factors (surgeon experience/journal impact factor) influence their applicability. Methods In this survey study we used the Pubmed/Medline database to select 32 consecutive randomized clinical trials published between 2013 and 2015, involving hand surgery (high/low impact). These studies were independently assessed by 20 hand surgeons (with more or less than 10 years of practice) who answered 4 questions regarding their applicability. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa and comparison of proportions via chi-square statistics. P-value <5% constituted statistical significance. Results A total of 640 evaluations were produced, generating 2560 responses. A weak correlation was observed between less and more experienced respondents (kappa <0.2; range 0.119-0.179). Applicability between the least and most experienced respondents was similar (p = 0.424 and p = 0.70). Stratification by journal impact factor showed no greater propensity of applicability (p = 0.29) for any of the groups. Conclusions Low agreement was found between the respondents for the applicability of the randomized studies. Surgeon experience and journal impact do not seem to influence this decision. Level of Evidence II, Prospective comparative study.

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a aplicabilidade de ensaios clínicos randomizados e se há fatores que a influenciam (experiência do cirurgião/ impacto do periódico). Métodos Estudo tipo survey. Selecionou-se (via Medline/Pubmed) dentre os anos de 2013 e 2015, 32 ensaios clínicos randomizados consecutivos envolvendo cirurgia da mão (estratificados como alto/ baixo impacto). Estes estudos foram avaliados de forma independente por 20 cirurgiões de mão (mais versus menos de 10 anos de prática), que responderam quatro questões dicotômicas relativas à propensão da aplicabilidade clínicados estudos. A concordância foi avaliada pelo kappa de Cohen e comparação de proporções pelo Qui-quadrado. Constituiu-se como significantes p menores que 5%. Resultados realizou-se 640 avaliações, envolvendo 2560 respostas. Observou-se baixa concordância entre os avaliadores (menos versus mais experientes): Kappa <0,2; alcance 0,119-0,179. A propensão para aplicabilidade foi semelhante entre os menos e mais experientes (p=0,424 e p=0,70). O mesmo ocorre quando estratificados por impacto da revista, não há maior propensão de aplicabilidade para quaisquer dos grupos (p=0,29). Conclusões Há baixa concordância entre os avaliadores quanto à aplicabilidade de estudos randomizados. Experiência do cirurgião e impacto do periódico parecem não influenciar nesta decisão. Nível de Evidência II; Estudo prospectivo comparativo.

How do board-certified hand surgeons manage carpal tunnel syndrome? a national survey / Como o cirurgião especialista em mão aborda a síndrome do túnel do carpo? um levantamento nacional

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate tendencies in the planning, diagnosis, and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by Brazilian hand surgery specialists. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed at the 36th Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress. We prepared a questionnaire about preferences in the management of CTS, and board-certified hand surgeons that attended the congress were asked to fill out the questionnaires. A total of 174 questionnaires were analyzed. Results: Electromyography examination is used by most surgeons. Night splinting is the most commonly used conservative treatment option. Half of the surgeons utilized prophylactic antibiotics. Most of the interviewees conduct inpatient surgery in the operating room and prefer intravenous regional anesthesia. Most of surgeons use the standard open technique associated with proximal release of the antebrachial fascia and do not perform neurolysis. Compressive dressings are most commonly used for 7 days. Conclusion: The approach to CTS among Brazilian hand surgeons with regard to pre-, intra-, and post-operatory conduct is consistent with the international literature. However, there is a need to reflect and conduct new studies on non-surgical treatment involving local corticosteroid injection, use of prophylactic antibiotics, hospital admission, and type of anesthesia in order to provide more cost-effective approach to surgical treatment for CTS. Level of Evidence V; Expert opinion.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar as tendências no planejamento, diagnóstico e tratamento da síndrome do túnel do carpo (STC) dos cirurgiões brasileiros especialistas em mão. Métodos: Este estudo transversal foi realizado no 36o Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia da Mão. Preparamos um questionário sobre as preferências no tratamento de STC, e os cirurgiões especialistas em mão que participaram do congresso foram solicitados a responder os questionários. Foram analisados 174 questionários. Resultados: A eletroneuromiografia é usada pela maioria dos cirurgiões. A tala noturna é a modalidade de tratamento conservador mais usada. Metade dos cirurgiões utiliza antibióticos profiláticos de rotina. A maioria dos entrevistados realiza as cirurgias no centro cirúrgico com internação hospitalar e prefere anestesia regional intravenosa. A maior parte dos cirurgiões emprega a técnica aberta padrão associada à abertura da fáscia antebraquial e não realiza neurólise. Curativos compressivos são habitualmente usados por sete dias. Conclusão: A conduta pré, intra e pós-operatória na STC entre os cirurgiões de mão brasileiros é compatível com a literatura internacional. Entretanto, há necessidade de reflexão e de novos estudos sobre a infiltração local de corticoides, o uso de antibióticos profiláticos, internação hospitalar e tipo de anestesia com o objetivo de proporcionar melhor custo-efetividade ao tratamento cirúrgico da STC. Nível de Evidência V; Opinião do especialista.

Evidence hierarchies relating to hand surgery: current status and improvement. A bibliometric analysis study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Hierarchy of evidence is an important measurement for assessing quality of literature. Information regarding quality of evidence within the Brazilian hand surgery setting is sparse, especially regarding whether research has improved in either quality or quantity. This study aimed to identify and classify hand surgery studies published in the two most important Brazilian orthopedics journals based on hierarchy of evidence, with comparisons with previously published data. DESIGN AND SETTING: Bibliometric analysis study performed in a federal university. METHODS: Two independent researchers conducted an electronic database search for hand surgery studies published between 2010 and 2016 in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira and Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. Eligible studies were subsequently classified according to methodological design, based on the Haynes pyramid model (HP) and the JBJS/AAOS levels of evidence and grades of recommendations (LOR). Qualitative and quantitative data were gathered regarding all studies. Previous data were considered to assess whether the proportion of high-quality studies had improved over time (2000-2009 versus 2010-2016). RESULTS: The final analysis included 123 studies, mostly originating from the southeastern region (78.8%) and private institutions (65%), with self-funding (91.8%). Methodological assessment showed that 15.4% were classified as level I/II using HP and 16.4% using LOR. No significant difference in proportions of high-quality studies was found between the two periods of time assessed (5% versus 12%; P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Approximately 15% of hand surgery studies published in two major Brazilian journals were likely to be classified as high-quality through two different systems. Moreover, no trend towards quality-of-evidence improvement was found over the last 15 years.

PRWE application in distal radius fracture: comparison and correlation with established outcomes / Aplicação do PRWE na fratura da extremidade distal do rádio: comparação e correlação com desfechos consagrados

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the PRWE score with other measurements that are already widely used. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study. Sixty-eight consecutive patients underwent surgical treatment for distal radius fractures (internal fixation by locked volar plate or transarticular external fixation). They were evaluated independently by PRWE, DASH, VAS range of motion, strength, and radiographic criteria, in one year of follow up. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare continuous variables and the Spearman correlation to correlate the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: PRWE correlated significantly with DASH (p < 0.001) and VAS (p < 0.001). There were no significant correlations with other outcome measures. CONCLUSION: PRWE presents significant moderate correlation only with DASH and VAS. Range of motion, strength, and radiographic criteria do not interfere in the PRWE outcome.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a correlação entre o escore PRWE com outras medidas já amplamente usadas. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal prospectivo, de centro único; 68 pacientes consecutivos foram submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico para fratura da extremidade distal do rádio (fixação interna com placa volar bloqueada ou fixação externa transarticular). Foram avaliados, de forma independente, por meio da Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), do Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), da escala visual analógica (EVA), da amplitude de movimento, da força e dos critérios radiográficos, no seguimento de um ano. Usaram-se o teste de Mann-Whitney para comparação de variáveis contínuas e a correlação de Spearman para os desfechos de interesse. RESULTADOS: PRWE correlacionou-se significativamente com DASH (p < 0,001) e EVA (p < 0,001). Não houve correlação significativa com as demais medidas de desfecho. CONCLUSÃO: PRWE apresenta correlação significativa moderada apenas com DASH e EVA. As medidas de amplitude de movimento, força e os critérios radiográficos não se correlacionam com PRWE.

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS NERVE ENTRAPMENT: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW / DIAGNÓSTICO E TRATAMENTO DAS COMPRESSÕES DO NERVO INTERÓSSEO POSTERIOR: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA

ABSTRACT Compressive syndromes of the radial nerve have different presentations. There is no consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic methods. The aim of this review is to summarize such methods. Eletronic searches related terms, held in databases (1980-2016): Pubmed (via Medline), Lilacs (via Scielo) and Google Scholar. Through pre-defined protocol, we identified relevant studies. We excluded case reports. Aspects of diagnosis and treatment were synthesized for analysis and tables. Quantitative analyzes were followed by their dispersion variables. Fourteen studies were included. All studies were considered as level IV evidence. Most studies consider aspects of clinical history and provocative maneuvers. There is no consensus on the use of electromyography, and methods are heterogeneous. Studies have shown that surgical treatment (muscle release and neurolysis) has variable success rate, ranging from 20 to 96.5%. Some studies applied self reported scores, though the heterogeneity of the population does not allow inferential analyzes on the subject. few complications reported. Most studies consider the diagnosis of compressive radial nerve syndromes essentially clinical. The most common treatment was combined muscle release and neurolysis, with heterogeneous results. There is a need for comparative studies . Level of Evidence III, Systematic Review.

RESUMO As síndromes compressivas do nervo radial tem apresentação diversa. Não há consenso sobre métodos diagnósticos e terapêuticos. O objetivo desta revisão é sintetizar tais métodos. Este estudo se baseou no método das revisões sistemáticas da literatura. Busca eletrônica de estudos primários utilizando termos correlatos, realizada nas bases de dados (1980 a 2016): Pubmed (via medline), Lilacs (via Scielo) e Google Scholar. Através de protocolo pré-definido, identificou-se estudos relevantes. Não houve restrições de idioma. Excluiu-se relatos de caso. Aspectos do diagnóstico e tratamento foram sintetizados em tabelas. Análises quantitativas foram seguidas de suas variáveis de dispersão, considerando IC de 95%. Incluiu-se catorze estudos foram incluídos. Todos estudos foram considerados como nível IV de evidência. A maioria dos estudos consideram aspectos da história clínica e manobras provocativas como definidores de diagnóstico. Não há consenso sobre utilização da eletroneuromiografia, e os métodos são heterogêneos. Estudos demonstram que o tratamento cirúrgico (liberação muscular e neurólise) apresenta taxa variável de bons resultados, variando de 20-96,5%. Alguns estudos aplicaram escores autorreportados, entretanto a heterogeneidade das populações não permite análises inferenciais sobre o tema. Reportou-se poucas complicações. A maioria dos estudos consideram o diagnóstico da síndromes compressivas do nervo radial eminentemente clínicas. O tratamento cirurgico mais utilizado foi técnica mista de liberação muscular e neurólise, com resultados heterogêneos. Necessita-se de estudos comparativos. Nível de Evidência III, Revisão Sistemática.

Hierarchy of evidence referring to the central nervous system in a high-impact radiation oncology journal: a 10-year assessment. Descriptive critical appraisal study / Hierarquia de evidência referindo-se ao sistema nervoso central em um jornal de radioterapia de alto impacto: uma avaliação de 10 anos. Estudo descritivo de avaliação crítica

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: To the best of our knowledge, there has been no systematic assessment of the classification of scientific production within the scope of radiation oncology relating to central nervous system tumors. The aim of this study was to systematically assess the status of evidence relating to the central nervous system and to evaluate the geographic origins and major content of these published data.DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive critical appraisal study conducted at a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.METHODS: We evaluated all of the central nervous system studies published in the journal Radiotherapy & Oncology between 2003 and 2012. The studies identified were classified according to their methodological design and level of evidence. Information regarding the geographical location of the study, the institutions and authors involved in the publication, main condition or disease investigated and time of publication was also obtained.RESULTS: We identified 3,004 studies published over the 10-year period. Of these, 125 (4.2%) were considered eligible, and 66% of them were case series. Systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials accounted for approximately 10% of all the published papers. We observed an increase in high-quality evidence and a decrease in low-quality published papers over this period (P = 0.036). The inter-rater reliability demonstrated significant agreement between observers in terms of the level of evidence.CONCLUSIONS: Increases in high-level evidence and in the total number of central nervous system papers were clearly demonstrated, although the overall number of such studies remained relatively small.

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Até onde sabemos, não há avaliação sistemática da classificação da produção científica no âmbito da radioterapia de tumores de sistema nervoso central. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar sistematicamente o estado das evidências relativas ao sistema nervoso central e avaliar origem geográfica e a temática envolvida nestas publicações.TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo descritivo de avaliação crítica, realizado em um hospital privado em São Paulo, Brasil.MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados todos os estudos publicados em sistema nervoso central na revista Radiotherapy & Oncology, entre 2003 e 2012. Os estudos identificados foram classificados de acordo com o desenho metodológico e nível de evidência. Informações sobre a localização geográfica do estudo, instituições e os autores envolvidos nas publicações, a principal condição ou doença estudada e o período de publicação também foram obtidos.RESULTADOS: Foram identificados 3.004 estudos publicados no período de 10 anos. Destes, 125 (4,2%) foram considerados como elegíveis, e 66% destes eram séries de casos. As revisões sistemáticas e ensaios clínicos randomizados foram responsáveis por cerca de 10% de todas as publicações. Observou-se um aumento das evidências de alta qualidade e uma diminuição das publicações de baixa qualidade durante o período (P = 0,036). A confiabilidade entre avaliadores demonstrou concordância significativa para níveis de evidência.CONCLUSÕES: Um aumento nas evidências de alto nível, assim como no número absoluto de artigos em sistema nervoso central foi claramente demonstrado, apesar de o número global ser ainda relativamente pequeno.

A importância do desfecho em ortopedia e traumatologia: traduzindo pesquisa em prática clínica / Outcomes in orthopedics and traumatology: translating research into practice

A pesquisa clínica tem como objetivo final gerar evidência factível paraa aplicação cotidiana. No entanto, traduzir os resultados de pesquisabaseada em evidências em prática clínica pode ser desafiador. Opresente estudo tem como objetivo salientar estes desafios, sugerire revisar ferramentas metodológicas de boas práticas, tendo comoexemplo tratamentos com plasma rico em plaquetas para lesões musculotendínease também o atual estado da arte do tratamento daslesões osteocondrais. Exploramos estudos e revisões sistemáticasenvolvendo os seguintes conceitos: diferenças clinicamente relevantes,erros sistemáticos, cálculo amostral, validade interna e externa. Autorese clínicos devem considerar estes conceitos para a execução e aplica-ção das melhores evidências. Deve-se contrabalancear os resultadosde pesquisa por meio de uma análise ponderada de sua robustezmetodológica e aplicabilidade prática. Nível de Evidência V, EstudosTerapêuticos - Investigação dos Resultados do Tratamento...

Clinical research is focused in generating evidence that is feasible tobe applicable to practitioners. However, translating research-focused evidenceinto practice may be challenging and often misleading. This articleaims is to pinpoint these challenges and suggest some methodologicalsafeguards, taking platelet-rich plasma therapies and knee osteochondralinjuries as examples. Studies and systematic reviews involving the followingconcepts will be investigated: clinically relevant outcomes, systematicerrors on sample calculation, internal and external validity. Relevant studieson platelet-rich plasma for muscle-tendon lesions and updates on osteochondrallesions treatment were included in this analysis. Authors andclinicians should consider these concepts for the implementation andapplication of dissemination of the best evidence. Research results shouldbe challenged by a weighted analysis of its methodological soundnessand applicability. Level of Evidence V, Therapeutic Studies - Investigatingthe Results of Treatment...

Prospective non-randomized studies in Orthopaedics and Traumatology: systematic assessment of its methodological quality / Estudos prospectivos e não randomizados na ortopedia e traumatologia: avaliação sistemática da qualidade metodológica

In surgical interventions, randomization and blinding may be difficult to implement. In this situation, non-randomized prospective studies (EPNR) can generate the best evidence. The objective of this study is to evaluate, by means of the scale proposed by Downs & Black, the quality of EPNR published in our country and to assess the interobserver reproducibility of this scale. EPNR published in Acta Ortopedica Brasileira and Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia until 2011 and prior to 2006 were included. Two of us independently applied the Downs & Black scale. The studies were stratified by period of publication, journal and type of intervention. The scores obtained were considered to assess the reliability of the scale and groups comparison. 59 studies were considered, seven excluded during the assessments. There were no differences between the scores, except for the type of intervention, which showed better methodological quality for studies involving clinical interventions (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient for the Downs & Black score was 0.79 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.88), demonstrating good reliability. EPNR present methodological quality similar when stratified by the periodic publication and publication period. Studies with clinical interventions have better methodological quality. The Downs & Black scale shows good interobserver reproducibility. .

Nas intervenções cirúrgicas, a randomização e o mascaramento podem ser de difícil aplicabilidade. Nessa situação, os estudos prospectivos e não randomizados (EPNR) podem gerar a melhor evidência disponível. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar, por meio da escala proposta por Downs & Black, a qualidade dos EPNR publicados em nosso meio e avaliar a reprodutibilidade interobservadores dessa escala. EPNR publicados na Acta Ortopédica Brasileira e Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia até 2011 e anteriores a 2006 foram incluídos e aplicou-se a escala de Downs & Black - de forma independente por dois pesquisadores. Os estudos foram estratificados pelo período de publicação, periódico e tipo de intervenção. Os escores obtidos de Downs & Black foram considerados para a avaliação da reprodutibilidade da escala. Foram considerados 59 estudos, sendo sete excluídos durante as avaliações. Não houve diferenças entre os escores, exceto para o tipo de intervenção, que demonstrou melhor qualidade metodológica para os estudos que envolvem intervenções clínicas (p < 0,001). O índice de correlação intraclasse para o escores de Downs & Black foi de 0,79 (IC95% 0,65-0,88), demonstrando boa reprodutibilidade. EPNR apresentam qualidade metodológica semelhante quando estratificados pelo periódico de publicação e período de publicação. Estudos com intervenções clínicas apresentam melhor qualidade metodológica. A escala de Downs & Black apresenta boa reprodutibilidade interobservadores. .